It has taken some time for the public to fully trust rapid diagnostic testing. Most people are accustomed to going to a family doctor, having blood or urine drawn and waiting days or weeks for results. This conventional process has created a nail-biting experience for even the most patient person, but it also has been the most trusted way to get accurate results. When testing kits became available over the counter, many people doubted they were as precise as those conducted in facility laboratories.
There are benefits for having access to do tests for your lab in this manner. For those traveling to other countries who are at risk for developing diseases like malaria, testing kits are a fast way to determine whether treatment should begin immediately. Often, conditions like malaria are not treated until the person affected has full-blown symptoms. Early detection can give physicians a head start on containing the disease.
In many cases, those who buy the tests are responsible for collecting urine or other body fluids for samples. They then have to send this by mail to a testing facility to get results. If the tests are not sent to another location, the collector is responsible for interpreting the results. If this is an unskilled interpretation, the results can create additional problems.
Although there may be room for error, the pros of having rapid testing options seem to outweigh the cons. Testing has become more affordable with less waiting time. This is a winning combination for the person who is being tested.